theongreyjoy:

im not sure that it matters to anybody, but my thoughts are with the LGBT community in Russia. Stay strong guys. I’m so fucking sorry.

Reblogged from Crezias
Tags: russia WTF LGBT

Femme is a queer specific term.

grrlyman:

Telling straight people they can ID as femme if they’re feminist is the same as telling them they can ID as queer if they’re kinky. Femme originated among trans women of color and lesbians.

It’s also pretty telling that anytime you ask a queer who thinks it’s fine for straight people to ID as femme if straight men can ID as bears and twinks they get all indignant. I think it’s related to how queer people won’t bat an eye if someone IDs as a queer and as a gay man but being a lesbian is considered backwards and less queer. Some terms are valued as queer specific terms because they’re most often used by men.

Reblogged from body positive zone
Tags: LGBT

During last year’s discussion we rattled off a handful of gay and lesbian characters in our company’s various works—yes, Rufus and Burnie did come up (http://gaygamer.net/2007/03/top_10_gayest_tabletop_charact_9.html)—after which someone asked the panel about transgender characters.


Screeching. Halt.


Awkward comments about girdles and curses and mimics.


And nothing.


NOTHING!


Between Joe, Jeremy, Steve Kenson, and myself—lifetime gamers each—we had nothing. But we acknowledged that we can do better than that. Already I’m preparing for this year’s seminar and already I’m planning to bring that topic back up with at least three examples from the interim year of Paizo products that have included positive portrayals of transgender characters.


That’s not for me, that’s not for some mythical GLBTQ agenda, that’s because a gamer at a convention told me she’d like to see a character she could relate to in our games. She wanted someone like her to slay monsters, cast magic, and be a hero.


No problem. I can do that. After all, that’s what Pathfinder is all about.

F. Wesley Schneider, Editor-in-Chief for the Pathfinder RPG, on including trans* characters in the game’s official setting.

Among other things, this has led to the creation of the genderfluid Arshea, Empyreal Lord (basically an Archangel) of freedom, physical beauty, and sexuality, champion of the repressed and oppressed. Arshea’s devotees spend a period of time living as the opposite gender during their religious training, and at the end, they are “encouraged to live their life as a member of whichever gender they feel they most identify with” (x).

(via ayellowbirds)

This is very very cool, and a positive attitude to have about having good and diverse representation so all sorts of different people can see themselves in your stories, and as your heroes. :)

I wanted to share this because it’s about a company understanding the importance of diverse representation (especially of strong, heroic characters) to marginalized people who, like everybody else, want to be able to see themselves in your world, living their power fantasies.

(via eschergirls)

Reblogged from Escher Girls

Carla Hale is a teacher — or was, before she lost her job at Bishop Watterson Catholic High School in Columbus, Ohio. See, when Ms. Hale’s mother died, the obituary mentioned all the survivors —and it included the name of her longtime partner.

Now, one of the parents of a student at the school read this obituary and sent an anonymous letter — ’cause that’s what cowards do — to the school, calling the diocese disgraceful for employing a lesbian as a gym teacher.

Now, if they called having a lesbian gym teacher “clichéd,” they might have had a point. But bigots don’t like points unless they can stab somebody in the back with them.

As soon as she returned to her job after taking a few days off to bury her mom, Ms. Hale was called into a meeting with administrators. They showed her the anonymous letter — and fired her.

Now, this story is more depressing and ridiculous than that last season of “The L Word.” But here’s the worst part: Ms. Hale’s termination letter actually said, “Your written spousal relationship violates the moral laws of the Catholic Church.”

So here’s the good news — because the “moral laws of the Catholic Church” actually violate the laws of the Bible.

There’s only one single passage of the entire Bible that homophobic Christians really use to condemn lesbians. From St. Paul’s letter to the Romans:

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: For even their women did change their natural use into that which is against nature.”

That’s it. The only reference to lesbians in the entire Bible. And, just like Hillary Swank and Chloe Sevigny in “Boys Don’t Cry,” it’s not even really about lesbians.

See, once you get past the fact that this was written by a guy who never met Jesus and the great biblical tendency to refer to women as sexual objects — “women changed their natural use” — which kinda makes it all sound like the Gospel according to Ike Turner — all it says is that Roman women once did “that which is against nature.”

We live in a society where you can inject botulism in your forehead — but Ellen’s against nature? The only kind of sexuality, my friends, against nature is pretending to be straight when you’re not.

What Paul’s really talking about there in that part of the letter are ancient Roman temple practices of worshiping gods that were mostly human/animal hybrids. God turned his back on those Romans and then they got all kinky. Many theologians believe Paul’s really talking about ritual bestiality of the Romans. It’s another case of Christians who don’t know the Bible, but use it to justify their hate — and that’s a bigger cliché than any group of flannel-wearing, softball-playing, men-hating sapphos driving pickups to a Wellesley reunion at Lilith Fair.

Now, Ms. Hale has filed a complaint with the city of Columbus, which prohibits firing employees based on sexual orientation — and her local teacher’s union has chosen not to support her.

But we do. Because in that same letter to the Romans, chapter 2, verses 1 through 3, Paul also says:

“Therefore you have no excuse or defense or justification, O man, whoever you are who judges and condemns another. For in posing as judge and passing your sentence on another, you condemn yourself.”

Oops. Turns out the homophobes are the ones violating the moral laws. And if you still want to discriminate against Americans based on something that’s not even in your holy book — well, guess what, Reverend — you can start paying your taxes like everyone else.

One final Bible quote from the Book of Ruth:

“Where you go, I will go; where you lodge I will lodge; your people shall be my people, and your God my God. Where you die, I will die — there will I be buried.”

But it’s a passage about two women — Ruth and Naomi. The Bible never calls them lesbian, but it celebrates their love and uses the same Hebrew word used to describe how Adam felt about Eve.

So remember — there’s one or two mentions of gay men in the entire Bible, but at no point does the Almighty ever forbid women being with women. And I find it just a bit curious that God has the same policy as Vivid Video.

Reblogged from Truth
Tags: religion LGBT

Happy, sad or angry – my son cannot stand to see me cry. As we held onto each other in that sea of people, he just kept looking at me and saying, “You’re going to get married, mama. You’re going to get married.” I nodded and laughed as I continued to cry, “Yeah, I’m going to get married.” Then, he held my hands and said, “Promise me you’ll get married as soon as you can, before they can take it away.”

And that is the reality of the world in which he has lived – that rights are bestowed by higher powers but can just as easily be taken back.

I looked around me… at the woman in her fifties standing alone smiling and crying, at the elderly couple holding hands who could not stop sobbing, at the couple who had a sign proclaiming their 25 years together and then to all the very young activists who shed no tears, only laughed and cheered.

For those of us who are older, legal recognition of our relationships seemed unfathomable for most of our lives. For those young activists who were all smiles, it has always seemed inevitable. There is no doubt that this was a political victory but, for many of us, it was so much more personal than that.

Reblogged from Balderdash and Whimsy
Tags: LGBT marriage

lovely-lace-and-fishnets:

auxil:

do people really think there’s this sudden influx of gay/lesbian/bisexual/trans* people because it’s “hip” and “cool” now or some shit you realize that there are just as many gay/lesbian/bisexual/trans* people as there were in any point in history it’s just throughout most of history you didn’t hear about any of them because it was REALLY UNSAFE TO BE ANY OF THOSE THINGS.

SO MUCH
Reblogged from half-sick of shadows

mallamun:

gatisss:

jesusfuck

I don’t know where this is from, but…

Between this and that Toyota commercial-

Man, I hope genderfuckery of this highly attractive magnitude just INVADES popular media until privileged heteronormative cismen who unthinkingly dominate the world around them through objectification of women and shaming of homosexuality are forced to think.

Forced to think because when they see an attractive ass in panties, they can no longer instinctively flap their dicks at it and say, “I’d own that” without having to think about gender or sexuality. Torn between their habit of reflexively objectifying women and gay-shaming themselves and others, they would have no choice but to open their eyes a little wider and actually think about the people they share the world with instead of living in a neverending reel of imagery that reinforces a narrow reality where they are king.

Reblogged from Balderdash and Whimsy
Tags: gif LGBT

billtheradish:

roxisangel:

herecomessickning:

gaymakeouts:

ok so if u are gay, lesbian, bi, pan, queer, etc that boils down to WHO you love

if u are kinky, asexual, polyamorous, etc that boils down to HOW you love

this is why none of the second list of groups is queer

I’m pretty sure there’s a difference between asexuality (not experiencing sexual attraction) and celibacy (not having sex for whatever reason)?

I’m kind of amused by the definition of ‘queer’ as simply ‘not straight’. Also, the idea of a straight asexual is just…what.

We typically identify straight as being heterosexual, correct? Which means, sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex (with a side dose of binary gender assumptions). So if someone is asexual, and thus defines their sexuality as not being sexually attracted to anyone, they are not heterosexual. I don’t care what your argument is.

You can be asexual and heteroromantic, yes. Or biromantic, homoromantic, and many other labels. But if someone defines themself as asexual, you do not get to claim they are heterosexual. Ever.

Also, please stop conflating sexual desire with love. Or at the very least, define your terms better so we know what you’re actually talking about.

Yes, thank you for typing up my feelings.

Reblogged from the Radish

herecomessickning:

gaymakeouts:

ok so if u are gay, lesbian, bi, pan, queer, etc that boils down to WHO you love

if u are kinky, asexual, polyamorous, etc that boils down to HOW you love

this is why none of the second list of groups is queer

I’m pretty sure there’s a difference between asexuality (not experiencing sexual attraction) and celibacy (not having sex for whatever reason)?

Reblogged from Balderdash and Whimsy
Tags: LGBT